header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Anna Worwood , Edward Floyd
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

The New Vogue?

Anna Worwood & Edward Floyd consider the tactical use of shared residence orders

The Court of Appeal had not considered the question of internal relocation within England and Wales where a shared residence order was in place until the recent case of Re L (a child) (shared residence order); T (a child) [2009] EWCA Civ 20.

This case concerned the mother’s appeal against a refusal to grant her permission to relocate with her daughter, L, from to to pursue an employment offer. The mother was British but had an Israeli passport. The father was Serbian, but settled in . The mother and father’s relationship began in 1999. They had one child, L, who was born in 2004. Their relationship ended in 2005 when the mother left with L. After separation, between 2005 and 2007, both the parents lived in and the father played a substantial role in L’s life. In September 2007, after being made redundant, the mother applied to the court to relocate with L and her fiancé to . Her application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll