header-logo header-logo

04 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New TUPE now in force

Leading employment lawyer sums up changes

Collective agreements on issues such as pay and conditions can now transfer to the incoming employer, under new TUPE laws.

The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January.

Leading employment lawyer, Dr John McMullen, partner, Wrigleys Solicitors, says: “Perhaps most controversial is the idea that a transferee may take the benefit of pre-transfer consultation over collective redundancies.  

“A transferee may elect to carry out consultation in respect of proposed redundancies prior to the transfer provided that the transferor agrees to it and the usual requirements about meaningful consultation are satisfied. It is perhaps dubious whether this complies with European law and the process is conditional on both employers agreeing. According to BIS, ‘it is unclear how many businesses will decide to use this measure’.”

McMullen says an “awkward” point in the 2006 Regulations regarding transfers involving a change of location or workplace has now been settled, meaning such changes could no longer trigger automatic unfair dismissal claims.

He added: “In some ways the Regulations are more important for what they do not do than what they do.  

“For example, apart from one small amendment the service provision change rules have been retained and the transferor’s obligation to give the transferee employee liability information has also been retained, and strengthened.  

“Of interest to employers will be the simplification of the rules relating to permitted variations of employment contracts and dismissals because of a transfer. Variations will no longer be invalid and dismissals only automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason for the variation or dismissal is the transfer.” 

McMullen says it will also now “be possible to renegotiate terms derived from collective agreements after one year and provided that employees are no worse off”.

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll