header-logo header-logo

04 February 2014
Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New TUPE now in force

Leading employment lawyer sums up changes

Collective agreements on issues such as pay and conditions can now transfer to the incoming employer, under new TUPE laws.

The Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 came into force on 31 January.

Leading employment lawyer, Dr John McMullen, partner, Wrigleys Solicitors, says: “Perhaps most controversial is the idea that a transferee may take the benefit of pre-transfer consultation over collective redundancies.  

“A transferee may elect to carry out consultation in respect of proposed redundancies prior to the transfer provided that the transferor agrees to it and the usual requirements about meaningful consultation are satisfied. It is perhaps dubious whether this complies with European law and the process is conditional on both employers agreeing. According to BIS, ‘it is unclear how many businesses will decide to use this measure’.”

McMullen says an “awkward” point in the 2006 Regulations regarding transfers involving a change of location or workplace has now been settled, meaning such changes could no longer trigger automatic unfair dismissal claims.

He added: “In some ways the Regulations are more important for what they do not do than what they do.  

“For example, apart from one small amendment the service provision change rules have been retained and the transferor’s obligation to give the transferee employee liability information has also been retained, and strengthened.  

“Of interest to employers will be the simplification of the rules relating to permitted variations of employment contracts and dismissals because of a transfer. Variations will no longer be invalid and dismissals only automatically unfair if the sole or principal reason for the variation or dismissal is the transfer.” 

McMullen says it will also now “be possible to renegotiate terms derived from collective agreements after one year and provided that employees are no worse off”.

 

Issue: 7593 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll