header-logo header-logo

05 September 2014 / Keith Davies
Issue: 7620 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

New review

public_davies

Keith Davies examines the development of the principle of judicial review in English courts

Judicial review is a term not known to English or UK law until very recent times, ie 1977, in secondary legislation, namely the Rules of the Supreme Court (Amendment No 3) 1977 (SI 1977/1955), Ord 53. In primary legislation it then appeared in the Supreme Court Act 1981 (now re-titled the Senior Courts Act 1981) s 31(1): “A procedure to be known as an application for judicial review.”

Origins

The procedure, though not the title, is in essence very old, dating back to medieval times as part of a larger grouping of “prerogative orders” including other orders such as “habeas corpus”, previously termed “prerogative writs” issued by the Crown to correct errors made by inferior courts (eg magistrates) and all other public bodies up to the level of ministers of the Crown. The common law is created by the Crown in Parliament to be administered by the highest courts of common law and equity, the central judiciary of the UK.

“Judicial review” is an American term dating from the judgment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll