header-logo header-logo

04 March 2014
Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-detail

New residence test exemptions

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has made new concessions to its proposed 12-month lawful residence test for access to civil legal aid.
 

In its response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR) reportinto the access to justice implications of legal aid reforms, published this week, the MoJ introduced two new categories of exemption - successful asylum seekers and refugees who didn’t claim asylum in the UK but are resettled or transferred here. The latter category is aimed at refugees from the Syrian war transferred to the UK under the government’s “vulnerable person relocation scheme”.

The MoJ says it will also introduce greater flexibility around the evidence requirements for those who may find it difficult to provide evidence, such as children or persons suffering from a mental disability.

Since proposing the residence test, in its April 2013 consultation, Transforming Legal Aid: Delivering a more credible and efficient system, the MoJ has also introduced exemptions for judicial review detention cases, some trafficking victims, victims of domestic violence and forced marriage, some protection of children cases,

Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) cases and children under 12 months. Originally, exemptions were proposed for asylum cases and members of the Armed Forces.

Issue: 7597 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll