header-logo header-logo

13 August 2013
Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New referral fee rules

Conveyancers not subject to outright ban

Licensed conveyancers will not be subjected to an outright ban on referral fees, but must comply with new transparency conditions.

The Legal Services Board (LSB) last week granted an application by the Council for Licensed Conveyancers (CLC) to alter the rules on referral fees in conveyancing.

The CLC identified the biggest threat to consumers as the level of information given to them about referral fees, and the timing of that information, in a review and consultation exercise carried out earlier this year. It has now altered its Disclosure of Profits and Advantages Code. 

Conveyancers have three months to comply with the new arrangements, which provide that: agreements with third-party referrers should be in writing and subject to periodic review; clients should be informed in writing of the arrangement’s existence no later than when accepting instructions, or when introducing a client to another person; clients should be advised they have a choice of provider; and the client should be informed of the nature of the arrangement, including any payment made, with whom it is made, and any impact, including any legal costs they are charged.

Anna Bradley, CLC chair, said: “Our review of referral fees in conveyancing found no evidence of consumer detriment—an assessment shared by the LSB and Legal Services Consumer Panel following their own past research.” 

In 2011, The LSB published a report on referral fees in the conveyancing, personal injury and criminal advocacy markets. In April 2013, referral fees were banned for personal injury cases.

Issue: 7573 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll