header-logo header-logo

07 June 2007
Issue: 7276 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

New proposals for very high cost cases

The Law Society is claiming victory in its fight to restrict the right of judges to replace lawyers who cause excessive delays to very high cost cases (VHCC) in England and Wales

.
The Ministry of Justice has agreed that lawyers who are causing long delays or who should be conflicted out of representing more than one client in a trial can be removed only following an investigation by the Legal Services Commission (LSC).

The policy—outlined in the paper Response to Consultation on Proposals to Manage Conflict of Interest and Capacity Issues in Very High Cost Cases—will enable a trial judge to refer cases to the LSC which could ask the defendant to find a different lawyer. It will also be able to insist legal firms sign legal aid contracts on one defendant per firm basis in cases with multiple defendants and where charges of conspiracy have been brought. 
Very high cost cases—trials expected to last 41 days or more—often include cases of alleged terrorism or fraud where several people are charged.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll