header-logo header-logo

05 April 2012
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New planning regime fuels concerns

Lawyers warn against government shake-up of planning policy

The government’s shake-up of planning policy could lead to delays and more appeals, planning lawyers have warned.

Last week, the government unveiled the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), which aims to simplify the planning process, put local not national government in charge of decisions, and introduces a presumption in favour of sustainable development.

Tim Johnson, real estate partner at DAC Beachcroft, says: “There are parts of the policy that are likely to cause delays through the need for appeals or judicial interpretation, particularly, for instance, the meaning of ‘limited degree of conflict with this Framework’ when considering what weight an adopted policy is to be given.Overall, the NPPF seeks to achieve a balance as it should; however, we continue to wonder whether it has resulted in policies that, in trying to satisfy all, will end up satisfying nobody.”

Jen Hawkins, solicitor, LexisPSL Environment, says: “The approach of the NPPF seems to be more of a ‘slash-and-burn’ than a ‘consolidation’ exercise. While environmental campaigners are more happy with the refined concept of ‘sustainable development’, which now refers to the five principles of the UK sustainable development strategy, tipping the balance between economic and environmental considerations inevitably renders it less ‘pro-growth’ than its former draft form. This more detailed definition offers a new hook for environmental non-governmental organisations to latch onto, providing a policy basis on which to tackle global environmental impacts. It is easy to argue that developments such as the third runway at Heathrow are not conducive to ‘living within the planet’s environmental needs’.”

Issue: 7509 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll