header-logo header-logo

13 July 2018 / Toby Boncey , Stephanie Tozer
Issue: 7801 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A new line of attack?

nlj_7801_boncey

Stephanie Tozer & Toby Boncey provide a master class in litigation under the new Electronic Communications Code

  • Types of claim which may arise under the new code.
  • The power to impose an agreement on a landowner without his consent.

On 28 December 2017, a new Electronic Communications Code, which can be found in Schedule 1 of the Digital Economy Act 2017, came into force. In simple terms, its purpose was to make it easier for operators to acquire and retain rights to use land needed to enable them to provide comprehensive networks. The operators to whom the code applies are listed on the Ofcom website. Most of them run telephone networks and/or provide broadband internet access.

A number of types of claim may arise under the code. This article focuses on two of the most significant types of litigation under the code which are likely to arise in the near future:

  • litigation about apparatus which has been in situ since before 28 December 2017; and
  • new agreements: the power to impose an agreement on a landowner without his consent.

Apparatus

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll