header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

New guidance on child witnesses

Family Justice Council produce new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings.

An FJC working party, chaired by Lord Justice Thorpe, was set up after a referral to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal in the case of Re W (children) (abuse: oral evidence) [2010] EWCA Civ 57, which considered the issue of children’s evidence. In March 2010, the Supreme Court removed the presumption that only in exceptional cases should a child be called to give live evidence in family proceedings (Re W [2010] UKSC 12).

The working party says its research suggests the number of applications for children to give evidence may be increasing since the ruling.
 

Its guidelines provide points to be taken into consideration by the court when deciding whether a child should be asked to give live evidence, and a list of “dos and don’ts” for lawyers questioning children.
 

It emphasises that the court should “consider seriously” alternatives to the child appearing at a hearing, and points out that hearsay evidence is admissible in family proceedings.
 

The guidelines advise that all advocates have a responsibility to manage the questioning of a child witness fairly, but that ultimate responsibility rests with the court.

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll