header-logo header-logo

12 January 2012
Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

New guidance on child witnesses

Family Justice Council produce new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings

The Family Justice Council (FJC) has published new guidelines on children giving live evidence in family proceedings.

An FJC working party, chaired by Lord Justice Thorpe, was set up after a referral to the Supreme Court from the Court of Appeal in the case of Re W (children) (abuse: oral evidence) [2010] EWCA Civ 57, which considered the issue of children’s evidence. In March 2010, the Supreme Court removed the presumption that only in exceptional cases should a child be called to give live evidence in family proceedings (Re W [2010] UKSC 12).

The working party says its research suggests the number of applications for children to give evidence may be increasing since the ruling.
 

Its guidelines provide points to be taken into consideration by the court when deciding whether a child should be asked to give live evidence, and a list of “dos and don’ts” for lawyers questioning children.
 

It emphasises that the court should “consider seriously” alternatives to the child appearing at a hearing, and points out that hearsay evidence is admissible in family proceedings.
 

The guidelines advise that all advocates have a responsibility to manage the questioning of a child witness fairly, but that ultimate responsibility rests with the court.

Issue: 7496 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll