header-logo header-logo

23 May 2013
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New family standards set

MoJ aim to ensure quality of expert evidence in family cases

Child care experts giving evidence in family courts will have to comply with new national standards, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has announced.

The MoJ said the move would reverse the “increasing trend” for experts to provide “unnecessary and costly evidence” in the form of further written statements, clarifications and additional court appearances, which can delay child care cases.

Under the standards, only “qualified, experienced and recognised professionals” will be allowed to give evidence.

Family justice minister, Lord McNally says: “Poor quality expert evidence can lead to unacceptable delays for children and their families. By putting standards in place we will ensure only the highest calibre of evidence is permitted in family proceedings.”

A nine-week consultation, due to close on 18 July, has been jointly launched by the Family Justice Council and the MoJ. It follows Sir David Norgrove’s review of family justice, which found some poor quality expert evidence being put forward.

Dr Heather Payne, chair of the Family Justice Council’s Experts Working Group, which drafted the standards says: “The standards are designed to improve the quality, supply and use of expertise to improve outcomes for children in the family courts.”

According to the MoJ, the average time for care cases to be concluded has already been reduced from 56 weeks to 45 weeks. It aims to bring the tie down to 26 weeks. £52m in legal aid was spent on expert reports in child care cases in the 12 months up to October 2011.

Issue: 7561 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll