header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

A new era for contact?

Will a new contact regime tame recalcitrant parents? asks Simon Blain

After a lengthy wait, Pt 1 of the Children and Adoption Act 2006 (CAA 2006) will come into force on 8 December 2008. The legislation sets out new powers of the court to make contact activity directions and contact activity conditions, together with new provisions for the enforcement of contact orders.

Contact activity directions
A contact activity direction can be made whenever the court is considering whether to make a contact order, or to vary or discharge an existing order. Contact arrangements must be in dispute between the parties, and the court cannot make such a direction when making a final contact order.

A contact activity direction is defined as “a direction requiring an individual who is a party to the proceedings to take part in an activity that promotes contact with the child concerned”. Examples would include parenting or anger management classes. The child’s welfare is the paramount consideration for the court when deciding whether to make such a direction. No party may be compelled to attend mediation and nor may they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll