header-logo header-logo

17 July 2019
Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

New Domestic Abuse Bill

Expanded definition to include economic abuse, coercive control & manipulation

A landmark Domestic Abuse Bill to tackle the issue and protect victims was laid before Parliament this week.

It includes the first statutory definition of domestic abuse, which will include economic abuse, coercive control and manipulation; prohibits the cross-examination of victims by their abusers in the family courts; establishes a Domestic Abuse Commissioner to champion victims and survivors; creates Domestic Abuse Protection Orders (DAPOs) to place restrictions on offenders; and gives automatic eligibility for special measures to support more victims to give evidence in the criminal courts.

A draft bill was published in January, following a public consultation that received more than 3,200 responses, and scrutinised by a joint Parliamentary committee. The government accepted the majority of the committee’s recommendations and has committed to further amendments as the bill progresses.

Prime Minister Theresa May said: ‘Domestic abuse can take many forms, from horrific physical violence to coercive behaviour that robs people of their self-esteem, their freedom and their right to feel safe in their own homes, but the immense bravery I’ve seen demonstrated by survivors is consistent throughout.’

The government also announced this week that it will ensure access to refuges for asylum seekers suffering domestic abuse and review the statutory response to migrant victims of domestic abuse.

Rights of Women (ROW), which provides free legal advice to women, said it welcomed the ban on direct cross-examination of victims but remained ‘concerned that the drafting of the provision is insufficient to fully protect women from abuse’. It called for extra safeguards to ensure DAPOs work effectively, including making sufficient resources and legal aid available to ensure victims’ views are central to decision-making, giving police rather than the victim responsibility, where appropriate, for applying for the order, and adequate monitoring of compliance with orders.

ROW, the Step Up Migrant Women coalition and other groups called for greater protection of migrant women suffering abuse, regardless of immigration status.  

Issue: 7849 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll