header-logo header-logo

31 October 2012 / Catherine Vine
Issue: 7536 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

A new direction?

Catherine Vine plots the Law Commission’s plan for matrimonial property, needs & agreements

Judges sitting in financial provision on divorce cases have been likened to bus drivers who lack information about where they are going. In such cases, all a judge is told is that “the driver is required to drive to a reasonable destination”. That lack of direction may be disconcerting to the bus driver, but it is no doubt terrifying for the “passenger” clients who embark on financial provision cases with no real understanding of how much they might have to pay to a former spouse and for how long.

Three elements of reform

The Law Commission is currently conducting a law reform project on matrimonial property, needs and agreements, the outcome of which, we hope, will assist bus drivers and passengers alike. The project has three distinct elements:

  • Marital property agreements (“pre-nups”)—agreements which seek to settle the financial outcome of divorce or the dissolution of civil partnership in advance.
  • The law relating to financial needs on divorce and dissolution.
  • The legal status of non-matrimonial property.

We consulted on pre-nups

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll