header-logo header-logo

01 April 2008 / Stephen Acton
Issue: 7319 / Categories: Features , Company , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

A new direction?

Stephen Acton reports on changes to directors' duties

As will be familiar to all readers, directors owe duties to their companies. This has, since the early days of company law, been recognised by the courts as a necessary consequence of the creation of companies as artificial legal constructs, the consequent necessity for persons to manage them, and the potential for the separation in identity between owners of companies and those charged with directing their management. The Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) has made statutory provision for these duties. What are the purposes of these provisions and what will be their effect?

 

Directors' Duties Prior to the Companies ACT 2006

Directors are sui generis, so far as English law is concerned, but the courts have fashioned and developed the duties which they owe to their companies by analogy with, and close reference to the duties owed by those whom they most closely resemble, in particular trustees and agents. This had led to the familiar development of the fiduciary duties

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll