header-logo header-logo

New court structure?

26 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

"Public interest corporation" could take over the courts

The government is considering handing over the running of the courts and tribunal system to an “independent public interest corporation”.

In a letter sent to judges this week, Justice Secretary Chris Grayling, the Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge and the senior president of tribunals Sir Jeremy Sullivan say: “A variety of difficult decisions will be required as to the appropriate level at which fees are set and about how best to deliver access to justice and value for money for the taxpayer.”

They are considering “whether the current structures could be transformed” or “whether an alternative structure, such as a more independent public interest corporation, would better ensure a sustainable future”. The aim would be “to ensure adequate investment and where consistent with the administration of justice, options to generate and retain additional income and capital for investment”.

However, they pledge not to erode the constitutional principles underpinning the administration of justice.

They state: “We are not and will not be exploring any options which will involve shareholders, the making of a profit or surplus or contracting out or profit-making on the basis of judicial and linked administrative functions, other than for the exclusive purpose of investing any surplus into the administration of justice.

“No replacement organisation for HMCTS would be contemplated unless it was a body operated solely in the public interest.”

In May, the Ministry of Justice denied it had plans for the “wholesale privatisation” of the courts and tribunals service. In March, Grayling said the MoJ was looking for ways to “raise the revenue and investment” necessary for modernisation.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll