header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Annapurna Waughray
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The new apartheid?

Caste discrimination has shed its cloak of invisibility, says Annapurna Waughray

I last wrote for NLJ in 2007 highlighting the lack of official recognition of caste discrimination in UK law. I argued that the Equalities Review—the overhaul of the UK’s equality framework which culminated in the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010)—provided an ideal opportunity to bring caste within the ambit of discrimination law (see “Caste: invisible discrimination?”157 NLJ 7263, pp 348-349). In the event, the Labour government decided not to add caste to the list of protected characteristics in the Equality Bill, citing as the main reason the lack of evidence of caste discrimination in spheres covered by discrimination legislation.

Moving forward, in November 2009 the Anti Caste Discrimination Alliance, a non-governmental organisation, published Hidden Apartheid: Voice of the Community, a report highlighting lower-caste experiences of caste discrimination in the UK in legally protected spheres (employment, education, provision of services and so on). The report’s title referred to the comparison between caste and the practice of untouchability in India, and apartheid, made by Human Rights Watch and other non-governmental organisations, and notably in 2006

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll