header-logo header-logo

11 August 2017
Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Neuberger calls for Brexit clarity

Judges need more clarity about how to apply post-Brexit decisions of the European Court of Justice (ECJ), Lord Neuberger has said.

After Brexit, historic judgments of the ECJ will retain the same binding status in UK courts, under the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (the Repeal Bill). However, the extent to which courts must take new judgments into account is not clear.

In an interview with the BBC this week, Lord Neuberger, who retires next month from the role of President of the Supreme Court, said judges should not be blamed for any misinterpretation if the position is not made clear.

Lord Neuberger said all judges ‘would hope and expect Parliament to spell out how the judges would approach that sort of issue after Brexit, and to spell it out in a statute.

Issue: 7758 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll