header-logo header-logo

26 July 2007 / Kuljit Bhogal
Issue: 7283 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Neighbour hell

Is this the end for disruptive residential premises?
Kuljit Bhogal reports

The government has recently announced proposals for the introduction of premises closure orders for premises whose occupants have been engaging in non-drugs related anti-social behaviour.

Currently, under the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003 (ABA 2003), s 1, police officers not below the rank of superintendent may serve a closure notice if they have reasonable grounds for believing that:
- at any time during the relevant period the premises have been used in connection with the unlawful use, production or supply of a class A controlled drug; and
- the use of the premises is associated with the occurrence of disorder or serious nuisance to members of the public.

If a closure notice has been issued, the police must make an application for a closure order. The application is made to the magistrates’ court and must be heard not later than 48 hours after the closure notice was served. The magistrates’ court may only make a closure order if it is satisfied that each of the following applies under ABA 2003, s 2(3):
- the premises in respect of which the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll