header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
23 September 2022 / Wendy Laws
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Personal injury , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Negligence after Meadows & Manchester

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
94715
Dr Wendy Laws provides an invaluable guide to interpreting negligence cases
  • The Supreme Court in Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK and Meadows v Khan set down six framework questions for analysing claims in negligence.
  • Do those questions represent a novel freestanding framework, or can they be integrated with a more conventional approach, to form a coherent overall structure for the analysis of claims in negligence?

In this article I ask how we should understand the structure of a claim in negligence after the decisions in: Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021] UKSC 20, [2021] UKSC 20, [2021] 4 All ER 1 and Meadows v Khan [2021] UKSC 21, [2021] 4 All ER 65.

The Supreme Court set down six framework questions for analysing claims in negligence—but do those questions represent a novel freestanding framework, or can they be integrated with a more conventional approach to form a coherent overall structure for the analysis of claims in negligence?

Manchester/Meadows concerned the scope of a defendant’s duty of care in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll