header-logo header-logo

19 April 2012
Issue: 7510 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Negligence

AC and others v TR and another [2012] EWHC 796 (QB), [2012] All ER (D) 26 (Apr)

If an accident resulted from the dangerous state of repair of a stretch of road rather than a particular spot on the road, then, applying established principles, it was material to consider whether the condition of the relevant stretch of road and not just at one spot had been dangerous and whether the dangerous condition had been created by the failure to maintain or repair the highway. The statutory test to be applied in deciding whether the authority had made out a defence under s 58 of the Highways Act 1980 was one of reasonableness not practicality. The burden was on the authority to establish that they took such care as in all the circumstances had been reasonably required to secure that the part of the highway to which the action related was not dangerous to traffic.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll