header-logo header-logo

10 March 2017
Issue: 7737 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Negligence

Webster (a child and protected party, by his mother and Litigation Friend, Butler) v Burton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 62, [2017] All ER (D) 189 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal, Civil Division allowed an appeal of the claimant in respect of a finding in favour of the defendant hospital in relation to causation of the claimant’s birth injuries. The court found that the judge had followed the approach in Bolam v Frien Hospital [1957] 2 All ER 118 of basing his judgment on whether the consultant had acted in accordance with a responsible body of expert medical opinion and it was clear from the more recent decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] 2 All ER 1031 that that was no longer the correct approach.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll