header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Financial services litigation , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NatWest case means no bank ‘too big’

Bank to face money laundering accusations in court

Money laundering action launched against NatWest will send ‘shockwaves’ through the financial sector, a senior criminal lawyer has said.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced this week it has begun criminal proceedings against National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest) in respect of offences under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (MLR).

It is the FCA’s first criminal prosecution under the MLR and the first under the regulations to be brought against a bank.

The allegations relate to failings to determine, conduct and demonstrate due diligence and ongoing monitoring of relationships with customers to prevent money laundering between 11 November 2011 and 19 October 2016.

The FCA alleges about £365m was paid into a UK incorporated customer’s accounts, of which about £264m was in cash. Natwest is scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 14 April. No individuals are being charged under the proceedings.

Claire Cross, a partner at Corker Binning specialising in white collar fraud, said: ‘Despite Mark Steward, the FCA’s head of enforcement, stating back in 2018 that the regulator had commenced a small number of investigations to ascertain whether there had been any misconduct in the industry that might justify a prosecution under the MLR, up until today the general consensus was that a criminal case would be unlikely to be forth coming. 

‘This was partly due to the fact that the FCA had shut the majority of its criminal based investigations in this area and partly due to the amount of time that had passed since the original announcement.’

Cross said the proceedings set ‘an important precedent―no-one is too big to escape the FCA’s criminal net.

‘Mark Steward claimed in 2019 that he suspected that criminal cases rather than civil or regulatory action would be “exceptional” but he was also keen that the prosecution powers should not be a “white elephant”.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll