header-logo header-logo

17 March 2021
Issue: 7925 / Categories: Legal News , Financial services litigation , Criminal , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NatWest case means no bank ‘too big’

Bank to face money laundering accusations in court

Money laundering action launched against NatWest will send ‘shockwaves’ through the financial sector, a senior criminal lawyer has said.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced this week it has begun criminal proceedings against National Westminster Bank Plc (NatWest) in respect of offences under the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 (MLR).

It is the FCA’s first criminal prosecution under the MLR and the first under the regulations to be brought against a bank.

The allegations relate to failings to determine, conduct and demonstrate due diligence and ongoing monitoring of relationships with customers to prevent money laundering between 11 November 2011 and 19 October 2016.

The FCA alleges about £365m was paid into a UK incorporated customer’s accounts, of which about £264m was in cash. Natwest is scheduled to appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on 14 April. No individuals are being charged under the proceedings.

Claire Cross, a partner at Corker Binning specialising in white collar fraud, said: ‘Despite Mark Steward, the FCA’s head of enforcement, stating back in 2018 that the regulator had commenced a small number of investigations to ascertain whether there had been any misconduct in the industry that might justify a prosecution under the MLR, up until today the general consensus was that a criminal case would be unlikely to be forth coming. 

‘This was partly due to the fact that the FCA had shut the majority of its criminal based investigations in this area and partly due to the amount of time that had passed since the original announcement.’

Cross said the proceedings set ‘an important precedent―no-one is too big to escape the FCA’s criminal net.

‘Mark Steward claimed in 2019 that he suspected that criminal cases rather than civil or regulatory action would be “exceptional” but he was also keen that the prosecution powers should not be a “white elephant”.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll