header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

National Health Service

R (on the application of the Enfield London Borough Council) v Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group and others [2013] EWHC 3496 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 279 (Nov)

In September 2013, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and an NHS Trust decided to implement prior decisions, endorsed by the secretary of state for health to close the accident and emergency department of a hospital (the A&E) with effect from December 2013. The claimant local authority applied for judicial review, arguing among other things that the CCGs had created a substantive expectation, either as to the actual primary care services to be in place before closure or as to an identifiable level of such services, from which it would be an abuse of power for the CCGs to depart. 

In refusing permission to apply for judicial review, the court held that it was settled law that the initial burden lay on an applicant to prove the legitimacy of his expectation. That meant that, in a claim based on a promise, the claimant had to prove the promise, and that it had been clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification. If

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll