header-logo header-logo

06 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

National Health Service

R (on the application of the Enfield London Borough Council) v Barnet Clinical Commissioning Group and others [2013] EWHC 3496 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 279 (Nov)

In September 2013, clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and an NHS Trust decided to implement prior decisions, endorsed by the secretary of state for health to close the accident and emergency department of a hospital (the A&E) with effect from December 2013. The claimant local authority applied for judicial review, arguing among other things that the CCGs had created a substantive expectation, either as to the actual primary care services to be in place before closure or as to an identifiable level of such services, from which it would be an abuse of power for the CCGs to depart. 

In refusing permission to apply for judicial review, the court held that it was settled law that the initial burden lay on an applicant to prove the legitimacy of his expectation. That meant that, in a claim based on a promise, the claimant had to prove the promise, and that it had been clear, unambiguous and devoid of relevant qualification. If

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll