header-logo header-logo

22 January 2016 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7683 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , CPR
printer mail-detail

Much ado about nothing

nlj_7683_regan

The Supreme Court has taken a rare look at CPR, notes Dominic Regan

It is exceptional for the Supreme Court to go anywhere near the lifeblood of litigators, the Civil Procedure Rules. Arcane points of abstract law are adored. The dull dross of court rules is not erotic. Well, they donned thick marigold gloves and took on an appeal which indirectly touched upon the dreaded Mitchell saga in Theverajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 78, [2015] All ER (D) 146 (Dec).

Thevarajah

Mr Thavathera Thevarajah was the claimant. He sued Mr Riordan and others. An “unless” order was made in June 2013, shortly after the Jackson reforms were implemented. The terms of the order directed that, in the event of non-compliance, the defence and counterclaim be struck out and the defendant be debarred from defending.

It was held that the order had not been honoured and so the sanctions applied. Relief was refused but on a second application a Deputy High Court Judge, after a hearing that unbelievably took four days, granted relief by a bizarre route, as we shall see. What the defendant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll