header-logo header-logo

23 May 2025
Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

MPs tell miscarriage of justice watchdog leadership to resign

MPs have called for the resignation of the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) leadership, in a scathing report on its handling of the Malkinson case

Andy Slaughter MP, who chairs the cross-party Justice Committee, said the CCRC leadership ‘has shown a remarkable inability to learn from its own mistakes’.

Slaughter said: There is clear evidence in our report that the situation for the CCRC has deteriorated significantly and it now requires root and branch reform.’

The committee’s report, Leadership of the Criminal Cases review Commission, published this week, concludes: ‘As a result of our concerns regarding the performance of the CCRC and the unpersuasive evidence Karen Kneller provided to the Committee, we no longer feel that it is tenable for her to continue as Chief Executive of the CCRC.’

In January, the CCRC’s Chair Helen Pitcher, resigned after the Lord Chancellor convened an independent panel to look at concerns raised about both Pitcher’s response to Andrew Malkinson's acquittal and a CCRC Board decision that she stay in post.

Malkinson was wrongfully convicted in 2004, serving 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. The CCRC missed opportunities to refer the case and failed to obtain a police file in 2009 and 2018 which would have altered the outcome.

The Justice Committee questioned Kneller, and Amanda Pearce, Casework Operations Director, in April in the absence of a permanent or interim chair.

Its report concludes it should not have taken an independent review for the CCRC to apologise to Malkinson, that the public statements of the CCRC chair following Malkinson’s acquittal were ‘woefully inadequate’ and ‘showed a worrying lack of understanding of the potential damage to the CCRC's reputation and public confidence’.

The Committee criticised the CCRC for not only ‘failing to offer a timely apology’ but ‘seeking to claim credit for the acquittal’.

The CCRC’s handling of the independent review of the case by Chris Henley KC was ‘incompetent’, the Committee said, concluding: ‘The level of delay and the attempt to minimise the damage to the CCRC's reputation were a spectacular failure of leadership.’

A CCRC spokesperson said: ‘We note the recommendations in the Justice Select Committee report and the committee’s view that its findings should “inform the approach of the next chair of the CCRC” in reviewing how we operate.

‘We look forward to an announcement on the appointment of an interim chair and to working with them in an organisation deeply committed to finding, investigating and referring potential miscarriages of justice.’

Issue: 8118 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll