header-logo header-logo

05 September 2018
Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

MPs debate whiplash reform

Lawyers urge MPs to ‘take government to task’ over Civil Liability Bill

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted ‘gaping holes’ in the Civil Liability Bill, as MPs gathered for its second reading.

The bill will introduce a system of fixed tariffs for whiplash damages. Secondary legislation will raise the small claims limit from £1,000 to £5,000 for road traffic accident claims.

Vidisha Joshi, managing partner of Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘It’s up to MPs to highlight the gaping holes in this highly questionable bill.

‘It is staggering that such fundamental reform can be based on such flimsy or non-existent evidence—for example, the Ministry of Justice has never explained, despite even the Justice Select Committee asking, how it came up with the figures in the new compensation tariff. What we do know, however, is that the number of claims is falling, while both premiums and insurers’ profits are rising.

‘MPs must also take the government to task over the increase in the small claims limit for personal injury cases, which is so fundamental to the reform programme but is not actually in the bill.’

In a briefing note to MPs, the Personal Injuries Bar Association (PIBA) and Bar Council argued both that the bill’s definition of ‘whiplash injury’ was too wide, and that the bill should not give the Lord Chancellor the power to amend the definition in response to future medical developments.

On the proposals for tariffs, they said there was no evidence to support the suggested level of them. Moreover, there had not been enough time for the effect of recent changes to personal injury claims to become known: for example, the requirement that courts strike out claims that are tainted by dishonesty (s 57, Criminal Courts and Justice Act 2015) and the funding reforms introduced by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Issue: 7807 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll