header-logo header-logo

15 November 2017
Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

MPs debate Brexit

The government was facing difficulties this week in its efforts to fix the date of Brexit, as MPs began an eight-day debate on the EU Withdrawal Bill.

Conservative rebels included former attorney general Dominic Grieve, who called the amendment to fix the time of departure to 11pm on 29 March 2019 ‘so very strange, because it seems to me to fetter the government, to add nothing to the strength of the government’s negotiating position, and in fact potentially to create a very great problem that could be brought back to visit on us at a later stage.’

Former Justice minister Jonathan Djanogly warned he could ‘only see downsides’ to a fixed date. Ken Clarke MP called the amendment ‘utterly foolish’ since it closed down the possibility of any extension to the talks. However, Frank Field MP argued that setting a date ensured the UK rather than the EU sets the date for Brexit.

More than 470 amendments have been tabled. By the end of day one of the debate, the government had won the first five. These included an SNP amendment that the courts post-Brexit should pay due regard to relevant European Court of Justice decisions when interpreting retained EU law. They also included a Plaid Cymru amendment to give Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland a veto over Brexit, and a Labour amendment on how a transitional period would work.

Meanwhile, Justice minister Dominic Raab has confirmed that the government will table an amendment before report stage requiring ministers presenting any Brexit-related primary or secondary legislation to first make a statement on whether and how it is consistent with the Equalities Act.

Issue: 7770 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll