header-logo header-logo

MPs asked to support fragile legal aid system

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News

MPs have been briefed on the fragile state of criminal legal aid before this week’s crucial Westminster Hall debate on the future of legal aid.
Andrew Holroyd, vice president of the Law Society, says the society has circulated a full briefing paper to all MPs in England and Wales, outlining its concerns about the effects of Lord Carter’s proposals for overhauling legal aid.

“It’s vital that we get as much interest as we can from MPs and explain to them just how desperate the legal aid system is and how bad things are getting because of lack of funding and the need for further investment.
“When you consider just how paltry increases in legal aid rates have been since 1993 up to the present time—probably less than 1% per annum over those 13 years when the costs of supplying the service have gone up over 40%—there is very little fat in the system left to cut.

The government is risking a lot by pushing practitioners further down a road where people are saying what’s the point of being in this game any more—we just can’t make it pay.”

Concerns about Lord Carter’s proposals to reduce the £2bn legal aid budget and introduce price-competitive tendering will also be discussed by society
members at a special general neeting on legal aid on 17 January, after Southampton solicitor, Roger Peach, rallied support for direct action.
Holroyd says: “There isn’t an awful lot of difference between us and Mr Peach.

We all are extremely concerned about the
situation in relation to criminal legal aid. We think it’s wholly
unreasonable—when it’s clear that the supplier base is very fragile—for the government to be making more cuts to the system.”

Meanwhile the society and the Bar Council are pressing members of the House of Lords to consider key amendments to the Legal
Services Bill.

Bar Council chairman, Geoffrey Vos QC, says: “We support the main thrust of the Legal Services Bill, but there is a real risk of its true goals being impeded if it is not now made the subject of detailed fine-tuning by the House of Lords.”

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll