header-logo header-logo

30 September 2020 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Features , Employment , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Moving on from furlough

28457
Charles Pigott discusses government moves to protect furloughed employees’ redundancy pay

In brief

  • Emergency legislation took effect on 31 July which aims to prevent furloughed employees losing out on statutory redundancy pay.
  • The new legislation also applies to other statutory entitlements due on termination of employment.

The Employment Rights Act 1996 (Coronavirus, Calculation of Week’s Pay) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/814) (the regulations) were made on 29 July and came into effect on 31 July. That was the day before government funding for the wage costs of furloughed staff started to be reduced.

The explanatory notes state that the regulations seek to ensure ‘for the benefit of furloughed employees whose employment is terminated, that the calculation of statutory entitlements relating to termination is based on their normal pay, rather than their furlough pay’. The government was concerned that without these regulations, there might be some circumstances in which a furloughed employee’s statutory entitlements could be calculated at 80% of normal pay, the minimum level of pay guaranteed under the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (the scheme).

Adjusting the definition of a week’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll