header-logo header-logo

26 February 2014 / Aidan Briggs
Issue: 7596 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

More skeletons in the closet?

web_briggs

Business support may be the banks' next headache, says Aidan Briggs

Two recent reports—the RBS Independent Lending Review led by Andrew Large and Lawrence Tomlinson's Banks' Lending Practices: Treatment of Businesses in Distress —have sought to shed light on the "business support" measures imposed by lending banks upon small- and medium-sized enterprises in distress. Such behaviour has come to the fore in mis-selling litigation, as it tends to multiply the burden of interest rate hedging or other products upon struggling businesses.

The key issues

Both reports identify four key issues:

  • Lenders engineering “distress” in client businesses by restricting credit or arbitrarily revaluing assets (eg on a “fire sale” basis);
  • Business support imposing dramatic changes to lending terms by reason of that “distress”, accelerating the client’s decline;
  • Perverse incentives to push viable businesses into insolvency due to increased margins and fees; and
  • Conflicts of interest for bank-appointed valuers, accountants and managers with a view to future insolvency.

The frankly delicious facts of RBS v Highland Financial Securities [2013] EWCA Civ 328, [2013] All ER (D) 65 (Apr)—in which the taxpayer-owned bank

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll