header-logo header-logo

22 September 2016 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7715 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Human rights
printer mail-detail

More questions than answers?

nlj_7715_robins

Jon Robins reviews the Lord Chancellor’s first outing before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee

There are only so many ways of saying “Can I get back to you on that?”. The new lord chancellor must have used every single one of them in a frustrating debut before the House of Commons’ Justice Committee earlier this month.

After all the harrumphing over the appropriateness or not of Liz Truss’s appointment as our first female lord chancellor—some fair, some not—you might have expected the minister to have spent the summer mugging up on her new brief.

If she had, there wasn’t much evidence of it. Much of the session was devoted to the MPs trying to get a handle on what the change in officeholder might mean for her predecessor’s plans for the biggest shake up of prisons since Victorian times.

Pressing issues

After thanking MPs for “the fantastic opportunity to set out my agenda”, Liz Truss confirmed that, yes, sorting out our prisons was “the most pressing issue”. The second key priority was making sure that our justice system “works for everyone”,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll