header-logo header-logo

26 May 2021
Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

More measures needed for protecting witnesses

Intimidated as well as vulnerable witnesses should be allowed to pre-record their evidence in chief and cross examination, a review by Victims’ Commissioner Dame Vera Baird QC has recommended.

This frees the witnesses from having to testify at trial and allows them to have therapy, if they wish, without fearing their notes might be accessed in the trial, according to the review, ‘Next steps for special measures’.

Currently, this option is available under section 28 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to victims and witnesses deemed vulnerable, and there has been increased take-up of s 28 during the COVID-19 pandemic. It is also being piloted for intimidated witnesses at Leeds, Liverpool and Kingston upon Thames Crown Courts.

Dame Vera recommended it be more widely used for both intimidated and vulnerable witnesses and introduced across all Crown Courts as soon as practically possible, especially where trial dates are a long time in the future.

In all, she makes 21 recommendations, including promoting the closure of the public gallery as a special measure to avoid intimidation during evidence, the development of a national protocol for data collection on special measures, and provision of a separate court entrance for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses.

Dame Vera found special measures were widely praised but there was an over-complicated system for assessing witnesses’ needs and providing support. Magistrates’ courts tended to lag behind in the use of special measures and she said it was ‘urgent to upgrade facilities and boost the Witness Care Unit resources to ensure parity of witness care with the Crown Court’.

Welcoming the review, Ellie Reeves MP, Shadow Solicitor General, said: ‘With record numbers of rape victims withdrawing from prosecutions, and the court backlog now at over 58,000 cases, many survivors feel the system is working against them, not for them. Giving witness testimony can be extremely upsetting and traumatising.’

Issue: 7934 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll