header-logo header-logo

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

More delays to legal aid reforms

News

Changes to the criminal legal aid contract—due to be introduced in October—are to be further delayed until January 2008, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) says.

The news comes as the LSC confirms plans to appeal the judgment in the judicial review brought against the unified contract by the Law Society, R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.
The LSC is disputing Mr Justice Beatson’s ruling that the LSC’s power to amend the “technical specifications” of the contract, such as peer review requirements and key performance indicators, breached EU law. 
Law Society president Andrew Holroyd says the LSC should now reconsider introducing civil contracts in October.

He says: “There is a significant threat that ploughing ahead with these changes will drive out good quality and well organised firms. There will be no legal aid lawyers to represent those that need it most. We call on the government to delay all the current changes, and to sit down with us to discuss whether there is a better way forward. It is not too late to sort this out to create a sustainable future for legal aid.”

The LSC admits confusion arising from the ruling was part of the reason for the delay to the criminal contract changes, but has pledged to introduce fixed fees for civil work in October 2007.

It says that, unlike the civil unified contract, the general criminal contract (GCC) was entered into some time before the legal aid reform programme was announced, therefore providers would not have been aware of the proposed reforms at the time they signed. Because of this and “the uncertainty arising from the unified contract judgment, the LSC will not now issue a notice of amendment”.

The LSC plans to terminate the existing GCC from 13 January 2008; award new contracts to operate for six months from 14 January 2008; and re-allocate duty solicitor work and issue rotas on that basis for the six months of the new contract.

Legal aid reforms for criminal work that were to be implemented between 15 October 2007 and 1 January 2008 will now be incorporated into the criminal contract to be introduced on 14 January 2008.

These include: the new police station fixed fees; expansion of the duty solicitor call centre and Criminal Defence Service Direct; and introduction of the very high cost case contracting panel.

The litigator graduated fee scheme is pencilled in for introduction at the same time, subject to the outcome of a consultation, and the unified contract for criminal legal aid services is planned for July 2008. 

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll