header-logo header-logo

More delays to legal aid reforms

13 September 2007
Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

News

Changes to the criminal legal aid contract—due to be introduced in October—are to be further delayed until January 2008, the Legal Services Commission (LSC) says.

The news comes as the LSC confirms plans to appeal the judgment in the judicial review brought against the unified contract by the Law Society, R (on the application of the Law Society) v Legal Services Commission.
The LSC is disputing Mr Justice Beatson’s ruling that the LSC’s power to amend the “technical specifications” of the contract, such as peer review requirements and key performance indicators, breached EU law. 
Law Society president Andrew Holroyd says the LSC should now reconsider introducing civil contracts in October.

He says: “There is a significant threat that ploughing ahead with these changes will drive out good quality and well organised firms. There will be no legal aid lawyers to represent those that need it most. We call on the government to delay all the current changes, and to sit down with us to discuss whether there is a better way forward. It is not too late to sort this out to create a sustainable future for legal aid.”

The LSC admits confusion arising from the ruling was part of the reason for the delay to the criminal contract changes, but has pledged to introduce fixed fees for civil work in October 2007.

It says that, unlike the civil unified contract, the general criminal contract (GCC) was entered into some time before the legal aid reform programme was announced, therefore providers would not have been aware of the proposed reforms at the time they signed. Because of this and “the uncertainty arising from the unified contract judgment, the LSC will not now issue a notice of amendment”.

The LSC plans to terminate the existing GCC from 13 January 2008; award new contracts to operate for six months from 14 January 2008; and re-allocate duty solicitor work and issue rotas on that basis for the six months of the new contract.

Legal aid reforms for criminal work that were to be implemented between 15 October 2007 and 1 January 2008 will now be incorporated into the criminal contract to be introduced on 14 January 2008.

These include: the new police station fixed fees; expansion of the duty solicitor call centre and Criminal Defence Service Direct; and introduction of the very high cost case contracting panel.

The litigator graduated fee scheme is pencilled in for introduction at the same time, subject to the outcome of a consultation, and the unified contract for criminal legal aid services is planned for July 2008. 

Issue: 7288 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll