header-logo header-logo

03 December 2025
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Legal News , Employment , Disciplinary&grievance procedures , Compensation
printer mail-detail

More changes to the Employment Bill?

MPs will vote next week on an amendment to fast-track the change to the unfair dismissal qualifying period, as the government’s flagship Employment Rights Bill returns to the Commons

Angela Rayner MP’s amendment would implement the change next April rather than April 2027—while the Bill itself is scheduled to come into force in April 2026, the qualifying period is delayed until 2027 to give employers more consultation time.

Last week, ministers scrapped their manifesto plans for day-one protection from unfair dismissal, instead reducing the current 24-month period to six months in order to ensure the legislation passes through the House of Lords in time.

Lawyers have largely welcomed the U-turn.

Jo Mackie, employment partner at Michelmores, said a day-one right to unfair dismissal would have been ‘unwieldy and unworkable and we predicted this would happen as soon as it was launched.

‘Probation periods are important for both employees and employers and the tribunals would really have struggled to keep up with the raft of new claims that would have arisen’.

Rena Magdani, partner at Freeths, said the decision ‘offers clarity to employers and employees and avoids what would likely have been complexity and uncertainty generated by the government’s proposed “light-touch procedure” during an “initial period of employment”’.

Ministers also confirmed last week the unfair dismissal compensation cap will be lifted.

Magdani said: ‘The current compensation cap is the lower of one year’s pay or £118,223. 

‘While the average unfair dismissal award is significantly lower than this cap, if the cap is significantly increased or removed, then the level of exposure to employers in unfair dismissal claims will increase, particularly in cases of high-earners, or those whose dismissal results in them leaving defined benefit pension schemes, or employees who struggle to find alternative employment.’

The Bill will retain day-one rights to sick pay and paternity leave.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll