header-logo header-logo

17 July 2015 / Ruth Hewitt
Issue: 7661 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

More than a bystander?

nlj_7661_hewitt

Ruth Hewitt provides an update on how & when secondary victims can run successful compensation claims

“Secondary victims” are those people who are not at risk of physical injury because of the defendant’s negligence, but do suffer a psychiatric injury as a result of witnessing the injury of a loved one. Alcock & others v The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (1992) AC 310 is the leading case, arising out of the Hillsborough disaster. This case set out what a claimant must prove to recover compensation as a secondary victim:

  • A close tie of love and affection with the primary victim;
  • close proximity to the incident in time and place;
  • perception of the event or its aftermath; and
  • that the psychiatric illness that had been followed had been induced by the event.

When judgment was delivered in Alcock , it was only the third time that “nervous shock” had been considered by the House of Lords. It was acknowledged that this was because the number of cases brought by secondary victims had increased due to greater understanding and recognition of psychiatric

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll