header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008 / Bill Davies
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

More than the bottom line

Bill Davies reflects on enlightened shareholder value on Oxford Street

On Monday 23 June 2008 the BBC Panorama programme reported that Indian suppliers of the high-street chain Primark had been sub-contracting work to firms who used child labour.

Primark had previously issued a statement saying that this sub-contracting had occurred without its knowledge or consent and was forbidden by its code of practice. Primark also stated that they had been let down by three trusted suppliers and had terminated their contracts.

Primark also announced plans to appoint a non-governmental organisation to improve the monitoring system that it already had in place. In addition, Primark is setting up a charity to help young people in the areas in which it operates.

The speed with which Primark has acted is not surprising given the amount of bad publicity generated. The viewing figures suggest that 4.1 million viewers tuned in and the story has provided excellent copy for the national press.

Primark's swift action may well mean that it suffers no lasting damage. This case nevertheless highlights the importance of constant vigilance for any company operating

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll