header-logo header-logo

02 September 2010 / Sarah Johnson
Issue: 7431 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Money talks

Sarah Johnson analyses employees gagging for a pay discussion

Gagging staff will become more difficult next month, at least where pay discussions are concerned. Some contracts include pay secrecy terms. However, these could prevent someone discovering whether they are paid less for discriminatory reasons.

When the Equality Act 2010 (the Act) comes into force on 1 October 2010, reliance on gagging clauses will be restricted. The Act does not ban gagging clauses altogether, but a clause will be unenforceable if it seeks to prevent a “relevant pay disclosure”. The intention is to ensure greater workplace transparency and dialogue about pay. “Pay” could cover salary, bonus and other benefits, such as pension.

Under s 77 of the Act, a term of a person’s work that purports to prevent or restrict that person (P) from: (i) disclosing or seeking to disclose information about the terms of P’s work is unenforceable against P in so far as P makes or seeks to make a relevant pay disclosure to colleagues or third parties, or (ii) seeking disclosure of information from a colleague about the terms of the colleague’s

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll