header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009
Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Money laundering burden increases

Regulation

A Law Society review into how solicitors’ firms have implemented the Money Laundering Regulations 2007 found two-thirds of solicitors felt supported by the Law Society in meeting their obligations. Most firms have updated their policies and procedures and trained the majority of staff in the new requirements. However, practitioners also said they faced too much red tape.
The review found:
 64% said the greatest deterrent for use of the reliance provisions was the fact they remained criminally liable for any omissions committed by the person they relied on;
 43% found it difficult to find enough information to apply simplified due diligence;
 a third of respondents had turned down a retainer from an exposed person, due to the perceived risk of the client; and
 there was a general perception that costs have increased since the introduction of the 2007 Regulations.
Alison Matthews, chairman of the Law Society’s Money Laundering Task Force says: “We see these results as a useful starting point to generate discussions about how we can work together with the profession.”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll