header-logo header-logo

06 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ attack

MoJ's proposals for judicial review reform face criticism

Lawyers’ groups have criticised the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) proposals for further reforms to judicial review for not having a sound evidence base. The MoJ set out its proposals in its consultation, Judicial review: proposals for further reform. In its response, CILEx said the paper referred to government “concerns” but these were based on “assertions and assumptions”.

Also responding to the paper, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association said the paper “repeatedly makes assertions unsupported by evidence”, for example no evidence was given for the claim that judicial review is sometimes used as a delaying tactic in cases that have little or no prospect of success.

Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll