header-logo header-logo

MoJ attack

06 November 2013
Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoJ's proposals for judicial review reform face criticism

Lawyers’ groups have criticised the Ministry of Justice’s (MoJ) proposals for further reforms to judicial review for not having a sound evidence base. The MoJ set out its proposals in its consultation, Judicial review: proposals for further reform. In its response, CILEx said the paper referred to government “concerns” but these were based on “assertions and assumptions”.

Also responding to the paper, the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association said the paper “repeatedly makes assertions unsupported by evidence”, for example no evidence was given for the claim that judicial review is sometimes used as a delaying tactic in cases that have little or no prospect of success.

Issue: 7583 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll