header-logo header-logo

24 October 2012
Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

MoD duty of care

Court of Appeal rules on MoD safety duty to serving soldiers

The Ministry of Defence has a duty to provide serving soldiers with safe equipment, and failure to do so means it can be found liable if soldiers are injured or killed, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Smith & Ors v MoD [2012] EWCA Civ 1365, also known as “the Snatch Land Rover case”, was brought by the families of soldiers killed in Iraq.

The families argued the deaths could have been avoided if the tank and Land Rover in which the soldiers died had been better equipped. The Court rejected the MoD’s defence of “combat immunity”, that it does not owe service personnel a civil duty of care.

Issue: 7535 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll