header-logo header-logo

09 September 2022
Issue: 7993 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Misconduct rules updated

Solicitors have been issued with guidance on sexual misconduct, following a rise in complaints made to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)

The guidance highlights that intoxication is not a defence, and covers factors such as unequal power relationships, career incentives or disincentives, social media, consensual workplace relationships that become non-consensual and sexualised comments.

The guidance, published last week, illustrates how far a solicitor’s professional obligations apply to their private lives, noting serious non-consensual sexual touching in situations ‘totally removed from legal practice’ and with no criminal proceedings attached may still amount to professional misconduct. It refers to the case of former Freshfields partner Ryan Beckwith, Beckwith v SRA [2020] EWHC 3231 (Admin), in which the High Court endorsed regulation of professionals by reference to private conduct although it quashed the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal finding against Beckwith.

Since 2018, when the SRA issued a warning to law firms about the use of non-disclosure agreements, 251 reports of potential sexual misconduct have been made, compared to just 30 in the preceding five years. The SRA currently has 117 on-going investigations.

Paul Philip, SRA Chief Executive, said: ‘These can be sensitive and difficult issues and we want to be clear about our expectations, not least for firms, as people often come to us because they are dissatisfied with the way their firm has dealt with their concerns.’

The SRA also published guidance on its approach to criminal convictions connected with protests, demonstrations or matters of principle or social conscience. It said it had ‘broad discretion to consider the context’ and was unlikely to take regulatory action if there was no significant harm to others or damage to property involved. Other factors taken into consideration would be whether the offence undermined the rule of law or administration of justice (such as resisting arrest).
Issue: 7993 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Regulatory
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll