header-logo header-logo

17 March 2022
Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-detail

Minimum offer may not placate criminal lawyers

Ministers have offered a rise of 15% (an extra £135m) in legal aid fees for criminal defence―the minimum recommended by Sir Christopher Bellamy’s Independent Review of Criminal Legal Aid―but it may not be enough to avert strike action by barristers

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) published its response to Sir Christopher Bellamy QC’s Review this week, along with plans to reform the system. The consultation paper had not yet been published at the time of going to press but proposals include removing the financial cap on eligibility for Crown Court defendants (the ‘innocence tax’), restructuring the fee scheme, providing funding for training and removing barriers for CILEX Lawyers.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said: ‘It is disappointing that the fee increases will be delayed for a few months more after so many years of waiting and it remains to be seen whether the investment will be enough to halt the exodus from criminal defence work, but we hope this injection of cash can begin to turn the tide.’

However, a Criminal Bar Association (CBA) ballot of members returned this week showed more than 94% in favour of refusing to accept return work under the Advocates’ Graduated Fees Scheme from 11 April onwards, if fee increases were delayed until September.

In a statement published after the government’s response to the Review, CBA chair Jo Sidhu QC said: ‘Our members have already made it clear that the suggested increase in fees by Sir Christopher Bellamy will not be sufficient to retain enough criminal barristers to keep the wheels of justice turning and that means victims will be failed.’

The MoJ also proposes raising the income and capital legal aid thresholds to include a further two million people, removing the means test for some victims of domestic abuse, providing free legal representation for all under-18s and for parents challenging doctors over withdrawal of their child’s life support, and providing free legal help for families at inquests where there has been a potential human rights breach.

Bar Council chair Mark Fenhalls QC said: ‘These proposals will help the most vulnerable have access to justice.’

Issue: 7971 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Criminal , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll