header-logo header-logo

17 July 2014
Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Minimum income challenge fails

The Court of Appeal has rejected a legal challenge against Home Office rules that British citizens must demonstrate an income of at least £18,600 per annum before they can sponsor a foreign spouse from outside the EEA.

Ruling unanimously in MM (Lebanon) & Ors v Home Secretary [2014] EWCA Civ 985, the court found the requirements were lawful.

Delivering the leading judgment, Lord Justice Aikens said: “The question is whether the fact that the new mininum income requirement (MIR) has the effect of treating different national, ethnic, racial or sexual groups differently has a legitimate aim and there is a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim sought to be realised.

“There can be no doubt that the aims of new MIR, viz to reduce the burden on the state and to encourage integration, are legitimate.”

Issue: 7615 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll