header-logo header-logo

A minefield of confusion

23 October 2008 / Hina Majid
Issue: 7342 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Hina Majid on the government’s probationary citizenship proposals

Integration, international competitiveness, clarity of laws and efficient administration are all laudable aims and the government is right to pursue these objectives in redesigning its scheme for settlement and naturalisation. However, the fundamental problem with its current proposals is that they are unlikely to achieve any of the above.

The Draft (Partial) Immigration and Citizenship Bill’s key innovation, as regards citizenship, is to reflect the creation of a new “probationary citizenship” status. This is to be interposed between temporary leave and British citizenship. Although not presently stated in the Bill, the intention is that probationary citizenship will carry only limited access to the welfare state. In progressing from probationary to British citizenship, the key change is that economic migrants will be required to demonstrate that they have been in continuous employment, complying with certain, as yet unspecified, conditions. Partners and spouses will also be required to establish that they are in an ongoing relationship.

Time frames for naturalising
In terms of the time frames, probationary citizenship is to last anything from one to five years. The total

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll