header-logo header-logo

04 September 2015 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Issue: 7666 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Mind the trips & slips (Pt 3)

nlj_7666_backpage

HHJ Simon Brown tussles with time for costs & consequential orders

At 3.30pm I gave judgment for the claimant for £1,250 (50% contributory negligence). CPR 28.6.5 estimates that there are 30 minutes to go for “costs and consequential orders”. We shall see, and only the defendant’s counsel had brought a White Book with him.

Statements of costs

The court clerk then handed me the statement of costs (summary assessment) filed by the claimants correctly more than two days before the trial (CPR 28.6.6). Ironically, I already had the defendant’s statement because it was filed out of time to the wrong court section marked “urgent” so that someone brought it to my chambers shortly before the hearing! They were in a form that I was familiar with but not in the Precedent H format that is easier to fathom how and why costs are incurred. Anyway, I looked at the grand totals:…wait for it…£5,353 (defendant)…and….£33,065 (claimant)!

Successful party?

Both parties claimed to be the “successful” one! As a first step, I enquired if there had been any Pt 36

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll