header-logo header-logo

11 September 2018 / David White , Tom Morrison
Issue: 7808 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Mind the GDPR (Pt 5)

nlj_7808_morrison

In the fifth of this special series on the GDPR, Rollits LLP provide a post implementation review

On 25 May 2018 the UK’s data protection regime was shaken up amidst much hullabaloo by the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Three months into its reign, as the dust begins to settle, we take a look at the impact the GDPR has had so far, focusing on marketing activities.

Marketing activities

Whenever an organisation sends out marketing material to an identifiable individual, GDPR will apply and the organisation will need to ensure that it has a lawful basis for doing so: typically the consent of the individual is required, but where it is not the organisation may be able to rely on its own legitimate interests.

In the run up to 25 May 2018 one of the biggest consequences of the GDPR felt by the general public related to the stricter requirements controllers had to abide by in order to process personal data based on an individual’s consent.  Almost simultaneously marketing departments all over the country (and further afield)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll