header-logo header-logo

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Mind the equality wage gap

Law firms have begun publicly reporting their gender pay gap, as all employers with more than 250 employees are legally required to do by April.

CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang reports no earnings differential among fee earners apart from ‘minimal pay gaps’ in its Bristol office, but across all its UK employees, it found a 32.8% median hourly earnings gap and a 17.3% mean hourly pay gap. It attributes this discrepancy partly to ‘the disproportionate female to male ratio in the firm, particularly in business support teams, as well as the high numbers of part-time female workers’ and says it is committed to working hard to improve these statistics.

Similar sentiments are expressed by Herbert Smith Freehills, which reports a 39% median hourly earnings gap and a 19% mean hourly rate gap. Shoosmiths reports a 13% median and 15% mean hourly rate gap.

Claire Rowe, CEO of Shoosmiths, said the firm was pleased its median pay gap was above the national average but recognised there was still more work to be done.

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll