header-logo header-logo

Migrant pushbacks: crimes at sea?

64417
Rebecca Niblock & Elspeth Guild investigate the UK’s international law obligations towards migrant boats: what place for border police immunity?
  • A proposed amendment to the Nationality and Borders Bill would provide immunity to the UK’s border police where they seek to prevent the arrival of asylum seekers in the UK across the Channel, even in the event of loss of life.
  • Legal experts have condemned the proposal as neither consistent with national law nor the UK’s international obligations.

News reports that the UK Border Force is being prepared to carry out what are commonly called ‘pushbacks’ (ie pushing back boats of migrants seeking to cross the Channel for protection in the UK to another country, usually France) has led to some serious questions about the legality of these proposed actions.

In the first instance, the Refugee Convention (RC) (to which the UK is a party) prohibits the expulsion of anyone seeking international protection unless and until there is a final decision on the merits of his or her claim (Art 33 RC).

Second, this prohibition on refoulement

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll