header-logo header-logo

19 February 2025
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-detail

MI5 evidence under investigation

The security service MI5 has apologised in court, having admitted to misleading judges in a series of cases in the High Court and in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) about the conduct of one of its agents.

MI5 relied on its ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policy to protect its undercover operatives to avoid disclosing the agent’s identity in court. This was in response to a 2022 claim brought by ‘Beth’, the agent’s former partner, alleging MI5 breached her human rights by recruiting a man who posed a serious risk to women and children.

However, the BBC has revealed it possesses an audio recording of a senior secret services official voluntarily disclosing to a journalist that Beth’s ex-partner is an MI5 recruit.

In a High Court hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain last week, Sir James Eadie KC submitted that an internal disciplinary investigation was underway. Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the Government Legal Service, has been appointed to lead an external review.

Chamberlain J noted the investigations would need to address whether MI5 had ‘deliberately’ given false evidence in 2022.

Kate Ellis, solicitor at Centre for Women’s Justice, representing Beth since 2022, said the revelations were ‘concerning and truly extraordinary.

‘We now understand that MI5 has misled three courts by giving or relying on false evidence—over a period of several years—and this has allowed them to avoid giving “Beth” any meaningful answers.

‘Most concerning of all perhaps is that the truth has only emerged at all because of a secret recording made by the BBC.

‘This exceptionally serious situation has wide implications, for Beth’s case and for the general public. It will leave many wondering whether evidence given by MI5 in legal proceedings—which the courts are expected to treat with particular deference, and which is often heard in secret—can ever be considered reliable.’

Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll