header-logo header-logo

MI5 evidence under investigation

19 February 2025
Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The security service MI5 has apologised in court, having admitted to misleading judges in a series of cases in the High Court and in the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT) about the conduct of one of its agents.

MI5 relied on its ‘neither confirm nor deny’ policy to protect its undercover operatives to avoid disclosing the agent’s identity in court. This was in response to a 2022 claim brought by ‘Beth’, the agent’s former partner, alleging MI5 breached her human rights by recruiting a man who posed a serious risk to women and children.

However, the BBC has revealed it possesses an audio recording of a senior secret services official voluntarily disclosing to a journalist that Beth’s ex-partner is an MI5 recruit.

In a High Court hearing before Mr Justice Chamberlain last week, Sir James Eadie KC submitted that an internal disciplinary investigation was underway. Jonathan Jones KC, former head of the Government Legal Service, has been appointed to lead an external review.

Chamberlain J noted the investigations would need to address whether MI5 had ‘deliberately’ given false evidence in 2022.

Kate Ellis, solicitor at Centre for Women’s Justice, representing Beth since 2022, said the revelations were ‘concerning and truly extraordinary.

‘We now understand that MI5 has misled three courts by giving or relying on false evidence—over a period of several years—and this has allowed them to avoid giving “Beth” any meaningful answers.

‘Most concerning of all perhaps is that the truth has only emerged at all because of a secret recording made by the BBC.

‘This exceptionally serious situation has wide implications, for Beth’s case and for the general public. It will leave many wondering whether evidence given by MI5 in legal proceedings—which the courts are expected to treat with particular deference, and which is often heard in secret—can ever be considered reliable.’

Issue: 8105 / Categories: Legal News , National security , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll