header-logo header-logo

02 September 2026
Issue: 8175 / Categories: Legal News , Online safety , Social Media , Technology , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Meta settlement shows power of civil claims, says online safety lawyer

The Meta settlement indicates civil claims are more effective than regulation when it comes to forcing tech giants to change, according to online safety lawyer Mark Jones

Meta agreed to pay up to $17.1bn (£13.3bn) last week to settle claims brought by 29 US states that Facebook and Instagram failed to protect children using their platforms. But could similar cases arise here?

Jones, partner at Payne Hicks Beach, said: ‘In the UK, families and individuals have compelling evidence that their children suffered serious harm, sometimes with fatal consequences, yet we do not see the same type of large civil claims here.

‘Ofcom can investigate and issue fines to the platforms, but that is not the same as securing justice or compensation for those families. The recent cases in the US against tech companies for online harms, appear to signal that it is civil claims that affect change more than regulation.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll